Woke up this morning, got myself a gun…
Well, no. But watching a Sopranos episode has a certain appeal. However, I have enough self preservation that only one HBO series may exist in my netflix queue at a time, and Oz season five is currently residing there.
And now, my current grr! Last night, in my multicultural counseling class, there were presentations. Everyone picked an article, grouped up and are presenting the contents of the article in class. My group picked one that seems interesting and informative and sufficiently multicultural. We’re supposed to present next week but it’ll likely be the week after. I think we’re the only group that will have anything to do with actual counseling, as so far, the presenters have gone ON and ON about schools, students, and poverty.
Yes, these are absolutely bigtime serious issues With Which We Must Contend, and yes, they do impact counseling. But some of these folks went so far off topic I started to wonder. Midway through one presentation I wanted to ask, hey — why are we talking about how eeeeeevilllllll television is? Because the article mentioned it in a single aside, then went on to talk more about minority kids who are taken out of school to provide free babysitting for their siblings while the parent(s) go to work, so the family can have food. And we were stuck on television for five minutes of a twenty-minute presentation - that’s a lot of time to spend off topic.
Did you know television is teh devil? Did you know that Certain Classmate has watched tv maybe twice in the past couple years, and only the news? And video games - ugh, never! That pronouncement was delivered with tight-lipped self-righteous energy that left a lot of us sitting there going “huh” and likely counting all the ways that bugged us. Well, it bugged ME. I was in awe of all the exclamation points devoted to scapegoating television and icky video games as contributing to mental deficiencies in kids, when malnutrition and a complete lack of investment on the part of parents in their kids’ education likely top the list for real reasons why. Television, in regulated quantities, is not in and of itself a dangerous thing. Sorry, group presenters. I personally see excessive television/video game exposure as a symptom of a larger problem, as in, letting kids have unlimited access to tv and video games is a visible sign of the lack of boundaries and rules in a given family, or of parents who are strapped for cash and gone all the time on one of their three jobs trying to pay the rent - you know, actual problem problems.
Television is yet another scapegoat in a long series of scapegoats. We’re too permissive, too punitive, too this, too that, that’s why our kids are screwed up, and every few years a new round of tactics surfaces — change the parenting style (buy my tape!), change the behavior (buy our book!), change the attitude (buy our tape and our book!), buy this blue snuggly or your kid will be autistic/schizophrenic/stunted. Yeah, whatever. Is it just me thinking that marketing drives everything these days? points at diet fads
Why not advocate getting help where you need help, and just do the best you can? Recognizing we aren’t perfect and making the best of things is possible, and much less anxiety-provoking than buying every parenting book on the market and paying attention to the unsolicited and sometimes mean-spirited advice of strangers. Parenting is not a science no matter what anyone says. Do consider diet, rule-setting, and disciplinary strategies thoroughly, but don’t kill yourself because you let Junior watch Blue’s Clues for four hours when you had the flu. It’s just not that big a deal. Moderation in a culture of excess is tough - it doesn’t help that we tend to shoot off 180 degrees when we find a problem. Excess in anything - tv, alcohol, gambling, prescription meds, vitamins, water, food, oxygen - can have disastrous consequences.
I wonder if the class jumped on tv because it would appear to be a solvable problem. “Turn it off” is easy to say to parents. But it’s a false fix. The real fix? Education. But how do you educate those who are in survival mode and don’t care? You can’t blame them for being focused entirely on where they’ll stay or what they’ll eat for lunch, when there’s no guarantee that either will be forthcoming. That’s what the group presenters should have talked about. What possibilities are there for these folks? The television babysitting their kids is the least of their problems, they’ll tell you. So what will you say when they come to your door, exhausted from the two full-time jobs and the stress of trying to get child support out of the deadbeat parent, having ridden the bus across town in the middle of summer to see you? “Stop letting the kids watch television.” How completely beside the point can we get?
It’s depressing to be moving into a field where you’re helping people who desparately need it, with limited resources. It’s not something one person, or even a governmental agency, can really fix. That will take a societal shift. Some in these parts are saying that Proposition 63 (which passed) is a start, a step in the right direction. It’s part of why I went to the county for fieldwork, and if possible will stay on as an intern. Changes are in the air. And I can be optimistic with a healthy dose of skepticism, because I know too well — mental health workers can only make progress when the client values whatever input the mental health profession may have for them. What value does therapy have for someone who has been existing on what can be dredged out of trash bins? They may need the help, but without the other solutions they need — food, housing, job — it’s hard to make any real progress. And the majority of the homeless and impoverished in my area are minorities, from cultures that don’t acknowledge therapy as useful.
Which is why I’m in a multicultural class in the first place. Learning how to understand and respect cultural tradition and belief that is different than my own, and learning to work with instead of against it. It’s just not helping that the class has fallen into the usual pattern of pointing and yelling at the symptoms instead of the real problem, which is a societal issue more than it is the fault of the media. While the media doesn’t help, it does grow out of a larger culture where people are objectified, stereotyped and treated unfairly because of skin color and classism. Television is a symptom in more ways than one. Turn it on and you can see a lot of heads nodding and backs are being patted that we’ve “grown out of” racism and prejudice, but it’s still there — it’s just harder to spot than it used to be. We may be using the same drinking fountains, but there’s still a schism in our heads. Even as I was interviewing for field placement I picked up on some of it — the attitude that because the black population drops out of counseling and doesn’t value it, we can’t help them. What came first, the attitude or the dropout? Sounds like a vicious cycle to me.
Which brings me back to Oz. It’s a hard series to watch, because it doesn’t step away from the race issue, or any other issue. But I appreciate honesty over the fake smiles and glossing over, and I appreciate the real character-making that goes into a well-written series like this, and while there’s a lot of people who condemn this sort of television for blatant violence and sexuality — it’s humanity. Do we want to accept it and deal, or pretend we can change it by ignoring it?
The series has a theme — the futility of our penal system. The attempt to rehabilitate prisoners by creating Emerald City was a good try, but every season we see more failures to make real change in these men, and more frustration and anger and burnout in the staff. Sister Pete (the therapist on the show) shows us every time how tough it is to stand up to the inmates and advocate for change. The inmates are trapped in prison with other inmates, all of them violent; how do we expect them to somehow become good citizens when we force them to socialize with other criminals exclusively? If while in prison they change the way we want them to, they become prey for the other inmates. Good people who make mistakes, like Beecher (who didn’t intend to hit the girl on the bike, but drove while exhausted - it could happen to any of us, couldn’t it?), end up becoming hardened and violent, or dead, as one hapless fellow who’d been in Oz for four days before someone killed him.
And a similar problem - how do we help the poverty-stricken people join society, if the issues include not just the money but the mindset? Released prisoners of the penal system and released prisoners of poverty have been living in different societies, where all residents are impoverished in one way or another. It’s an adjustment that carries with it a stress all its own.
We don’t like to look at the reality of problems. It’s much easier to put on a pair of {insert political party/religious belief here}-colored glasses, or just look the other way. Which is the biggest barrier to changing yourself, by the way. We want to think we’re okay just the way we are, and sometimes that becomes part of the problem. Sometimes we’re less okay, sometimes more so, but no one is completely okay, as in, perfect. What I want to do? Accept myself, warts and all, and do the best I can with what I have. That’s being real. It’s simultaneously the hardest and the easiest thing to do.
And how sad is it that I’m learning more from a television series than I am in a class where the instructor allowed the whole class to burn the television in effigy? I can’t wait to get out of school. It’s been a loooooong semester.