… are fifty kinds of awesome. I helped a friend install XP via Boot Camp and Parallels. I like both ways, it’s kinda fun to see the whole display spin about and turn into Windows as it has never been before - it runs! Fast! It doesn’t access hardware directly in Parallels, there are issues with USB drives and with cd based copy protection, but if you’re attempting to be compatible with work as my friend is, that’s about the least painless way to do it. It’ll even share a wireless internet connection with OS X so you can run update and patch XP until it’s sorta okay.
Me, I’d dual-boot Linux and learn it, in preparation for the eventual popularization of OS X. The mundanes will no doubt end up with Vista and be mightily stymied by the copy protection that will cripple your PC. Peter Gutmann wrote an analysis of Vista’s true cost that has been blogged and re-blogged, but outlines some of the issues at stake. To quote: In July 2006, Cory Doctorow published an analysis of the anti-competitive nature of Apple’s iTunes copy-restriction system that looked at the benefits of restrictive DRM for the company that controls it. The only reason I can imagine why Microsoft would put its programmers, device vendors, third-party developers, and ultimately its customers, through this much pain is because once this copy protection is entrenched, Microsoft will completely own the distribution channel. In the same way that Apple has managed to acquire a monopolistic lock-in on their music distribution channel (an example being the Motorola ROKR fiasco, which was so crippled by restrictions that a Fortune magazine senior editor reviewed it as the STNKER), so Microsoft will totally control the premium-content distribution channel. In fact examples of this Windows content lock-in are already becoming apparent as people move to Vista and find that their legally-purchased content won’t play any more under Vista (the example given in the link is particularly scary because the content actually includes a self-destruct after which it won’t play any more, so not only do you need to re-purchase your content when you switch from XP to Vista, but you also need to re-purchase it periodically when it expires. In addition since the media rights can’t be backed up, if you experience a disk crash you get another opportunity to re-purchase the content all over again. This is by design: as Jack Valenti, former head of the MPAA, put it, “If you buy a DVD you have a copy. If you want a backup copy you buy another one”). It’s obvious why this type of business model makes the pain of pushing content protection onto consumers so worthwhile for Microsoft since it practically constitutes a license to print money.
Vista itself is reported to require you to re-purchase it, should you ever have a need of installing it more than the 2-3 times they allow. You will never own Vista. You will lease it until your hard drive crashes, until spyware and viriii cripple you and make it more financially feasible to start over with a wiped drive, until some piece of software wrecks up the OS and you end up reinstalling. And then you will lease it again. This is actually nothing new. It’s just now they’re really coding the OS to enforce it strictly. No more calling M$ to beg them to let you have an ungodly-long string of numbers to re-activate XP.
If you read nothing else of Gutmann’s piece, scroll down and read the final comments, and the quotes from people buying thousands of dollars of equipment that won’t work as advertised.
My next computer will be a Macbook, if I can ever find a reason to give up on my Powerbook. You?